Singh, Hardeep MD, MPH; Graber, Mark L. MD; Hofer, Timothy P. MD, MSc
Timely and accurate diagnosis is foundational to good clinical practice and an essential first step to achieving optimal patient outcomes. However, a recent Institute of Medicine report concluded that most of us will experience at least one diagnostic error in our lifetime. The report argues for efforts to improve the reliability of the diagnostic process through better measurement of diagnostic performance. The diagnostic process is a dynamic team-based activity that involves uncertainty, plays out over time, and requires effective communication and collaboration among multiple clinicians, diagnostic services, and the patient. Thus, it poses special challenges for measurement. In this paper, we discuss how the need to develop measures to improve diagnostic performance could move forward at a time when the scientific foundation needed to inform measurement is still evolving. We highlight challenges and opportunities for developing potential measures of “diagnostic safety” related to clinical diagnostic errors and associated preventable diagnostic harm. In doing so, we propose a starter set of measurement concepts for initial consideration that seem reasonably related to diagnostic safety and call for these to be studied and further refined. This would enable safe diagnosis to become an organizational priority and facilitate quality improvement. Health-care systems should consider measurement and evaluation of diagnostic performance as essential to timely and accurate diagnosis and to the reduction of preventable diagnostic harm.
By Sue Sheridan, Patricia Merryweather, Diana Rusz, and Gordon Schiff
February 18, 2020 | Commentary
Cognitive Load Theory and Its Impact on Diagnostic Accuracy
Diagnostic errors, or “the failure to establish an accurate and timely explanation of the patient’s health problem(s) or communicate that explanation to the patient, ” are a leading cause of patient harm. To Err Is Human, a report published by the Institute of Medicine in 1999, was one of the first publications to bring the issue of medical error, patient harm, and the need for safer systems to a national stage.
Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, published in 2015, continued the patient safety discussion with a focus on the impact of diagnostic errors on medical harm. This report suggested that diagnostic errors may contribute to 10 percent of all patient deaths. In addition, diagnostic errors may result in serious harm to more than 500,000 Americans each year across ambulatory, emergency, and inpatient care settings.